Town of Lake Hamilton v. Hughes
This text of 18 So. 2d 23 (Town of Lake Hamilton v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The bill of complaint in this case was inartifically drawn, and it occurs to us that had an attack been made upon it by a motion to dismiss, the movant would probably have prevailed. We have thé view that the answer, too, was subject to some criticism for the same reasons. Wherefore, we believe that the answer was sufficient in the light of the apparent deficiencies of the bill. Therefore, certiorari is granted and the order sustaining the motion to strike parts of'the answer is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 So. 2d 23, 154 Fla. 468, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-lake-hamilton-v-hughes-fla-1944.