Town of Kittery v. Dineen

2005 ME 11, 868 A.2d 891, 2005 Me. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 18, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2005 ME 11 (Town of Kittery v. Dineen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Kittery v. Dineen, 2005 ME 11, 868 A.2d 891, 2005 Me. LEXIS 10 (Me. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] James M. Dineen appeals from a judgment of the District Court (York, Wheeler, J.) denying his'motion to alter or amend an order of the court denying Dineen’s motion for relief from judgment from five disclosure orders dated September 16, 2002. The disclosure orders, from which no appeal was taken by Dineen; ordered that money judgments against Dineen arising from Dineen’s violation of the automobile graveyard statute, 30-A M.R.S.A. § 3753 (Supp. 2004), be paid from the estate of Dineen’s mother. The District Court neither erred nor acted beyond its discretion in concluding that the motion for relief from judgment was without merit and was not brought within a reasonable time pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b). See KeyBank Nat’l Ass’n v. Sargent, 2000 ME 153, ¶ 13, 758 A.2d 528, 533.

[¶ 2] Moreover, Dineen’s appeal, his fourth involving this litigation with the Town of Kittery,1 is “frivolous or instituted primarily for the purpose of delay.” See M.R.App. P. 13(f). He failed to appeal from the five disclosure orders, and the money judgments have been paid to the Town of Kittery. He waited nearly one full year after the entry of the disclosure orders before he filed the motion pursuant to Rule 60(b), a motion that is totally without merit. Accordingly, we impose sanctions against Dineen in the form of attorney fees and treble costs.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Attorney fees incurred by the Town of Kittery and treble costs are assessed against the defendant appellant. Remanded to the District Court for a determination of the Town’s attorney fees on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald J. Trump v. Secretary of State
2024 ME 5 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2005 ME 11, 868 A.2d 891, 2005 Me. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-kittery-v-dineen-me-2005.