Town of Kennebunkport v. McCarthy
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE BIDDEFORD DISTRICT COURT CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. BID-CV-04-057 , . . -3y ,I - ' ,
TOWN OF KENNEBUNKPORT and DONALD L. GARBRECHT BRIAN SHAW, as Code Enforcement LAW f.IBRARY Officer of the Town of Kennebunkport, DEC n 8 2006 Plaintiffs
ORDER
THOMAS F. McCARTHY, as Trustee of the Valeska Family Trust and JEAN BOUCHER,
Defendants
Following review of the pleadings, but without hearing, the Town's Bill of Costs
in the sum of $228.92 is approved and that sum is awarded to the Town. The Town's
Request for Prejudgment and Post Judgment Interest is granted in part and denied in
part. Prejudgment interest is waived by the court. 14 M.R.S.A. §1602(1)(B). This case
does not involve a claim for compensatory damages, but rather a request for a monetary
sanction. Prejudgment interest is a form of compensatory damages. Moholland v.
Empire Fire G. Marine Ins. Co., 2000 ME 26, 746 A.2d 362 (Me. 2000). As noted earlier, the evidence did not reveal significant environmental damages. The monetary damages are
sanctions imposed principally as a penalty and a deterrent, and do not become
obligations until judgment is rendered. The Town is awarded post judgment interest in
the sum of $14.90 per day beginning on September 26, 2006. These awards are made
over objection.
Dated: November 16,2006 MELISSA HEWEY, ESQ. - P L A I N T I F F . Arthur Brennan ROBERT NADEAU, ESQ. - DEFENDANT ustice, Superior Court SEAN T . MCCARTHY, ESQ. PRO HAC VICE - DEFEND JEAN BOUCHER - DEFENDANT - p r o s e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Kennebunkport v. McCarthy (Town of Kennebunkport v. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.