Town of Kearny v. Mayor of Jersey City
This text of 76 A. 1118 (Town of Kearny v. Mayor of Jersey City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
We reserve, however, any expression of view upon the question whether Jersey City ivas, within the meaning of the act (Pamph. L. 1897, p. 232), the owner of water works. To that question the Supreme Court gave a negative answer. We find it unnecessary to deal with the question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Vooriiees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 A. 1118, 79 N.J.L. 599, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-kearny-v-mayor-of-jersey-city-nj-1910.