Town of Ilwaco v. Miller
This text of 36 P. 269 (Town of Ilwaco v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[450]*450The opinion of the court was delivered by
— The defendant, B. C. Miller, was tried and convicted, before the police justice of the town of Ilwaco, of assault and battery, upon a complaint filed by the appellant, Fred. Colbert. From the judgment rendered against him the defendant appealed to the superior court of Pacific county, where, by consent of parties, the cause was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in an acquittal of the defendant.
The trial court being of the opinion that the complaint was frivolous and without pi’obable cause, thereupon entered judgment that the appellant, as prosecuting witness, pay the costs of the action, amounting to §95.50, and stand committed until the payment thereof, and that execution issue therefor. •We are aware of no law in this state under which this judgment can be sustained. The provisions of our statute authorizing the taxing of costs against complaining witnesses apply only to cases of examinations before magistrates, and to complaints submitted to grand juries for their investigation. See Code Proc., §§1575, 1588, and Gen. Stat., §3050 (Code 1881, §2103). A judgment similar to the one in hand was declared void by this court in the Permstich case, 3 Wash. 672 (29 Pac. 350), and we perceive no reason to be dissatisfied with that decision.
Judgment reversed.
Dunbar, C. J., and Scott, Stiles and Hoyt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 P. 269, 8 Wash. 449, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-ilwaco-v-miller-wash-1894.