Town of Idaho Springs v. Woodward

10 Colo. 104
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Colo. 104 (Town of Idaho Springs v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Idaho Springs v. Woodward, 10 Colo. 104 (Colo. 1887).

Opinion

Stallcup, C.

The case is submitted upon the question, Is the town liable for that it had granted leave to the Sunshine Mining Company to build a flume in the street? The decision in the case of City of Denver v. Bayer, 7 Colo. 113, is decisive that the town is not liable.

Judgment should be reversed and the case remanded, with directions to the county court to dismiss the action.

Macon and Bising, CO., concur.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the court below to dismiss the action.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luxford v. City & County of Denver
65 Colo. 355 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1918)
City of Colorado Springs v. Stark
57 Colo. 384 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Colo. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-idaho-springs-v-woodward-colo-1887.