Town of Idaho Springs v. Woodward
This text of 10 Colo. 104 (Town of Idaho Springs v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case is submitted upon the question, Is the town liable for that it had granted leave to the Sunshine Mining Company to build a flume in the street? The decision in the case of City of Denver v. Bayer, 7 Colo. 113, is decisive that the town is not liable.
Judgment should be reversed and the case remanded, with directions to the county court to dismiss the action.
Macon and Bising, CO., concur.
For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the court below to dismiss the action.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Colo. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-idaho-springs-v-woodward-colo-1887.