Town of Huntington v. Albicocco

256 A.D.2d 330, 681 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13152
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 330 (Town of Huntington v. Albicocco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Huntington v. Albicocco, 256 A.D.2d 330, 681 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action for a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from operating an adult entertainment cabaret within the Town of Huntington, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered July 14, 1997, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against it dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified by deleting the fifth, sixth, and ninth decretal paragraphs thereof and substituting therefor provisions awarding judgment to the plaintiff on its third and fourth causes of action in the complaint and enjoining the defendants from operating the premises until they comply with the provisions of the Code of the Town of Huntington requiring permits for certain signage and a certificate of permitted use; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Town of Huntington (hereinafter the Town) established by clear and convincing evidence that the subject premises lacked the proper permits for certain exterior signs and in addition lacked a certificate of permitted use in violation of the Huntington Town Code (see, Code of Town of Huntington §§ 198-98A, 198-119, 198-120). Thus, the Town was entitled to enjoin the continuous violation of its duly-enacted zoning ordinance (see, Town of E. Hampton v Buffa, 157 AD2d 714). Additionally, the Town further established that the defendants [331]*331were operating the subject premises without a public assembly permit in violation of the Code of the Town of Huntington § 111-306.

The Town’s remaining contentions, including those regarding alleged errors by the trial court, are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or constitute harmless error. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hasson v. S.B.J. Associates, LLC
117 A.D.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Town of Brookhaven v. Mascia
38 A.D.3d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D.2d 330, 681 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-huntington-v-albicocco-nyappdiv-1998.