Town of Hillsboro v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
132 S.E. 657, 191 N.C. 828, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 197
Opinion
The .Court being evenly divided in opinion, Brog-den, J-., having been of counsel for the defendant, Merchants and Farmers Bank, in the trial below, not sitting, the j’udgment of the court below is affirmed and stands, as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent, McCarter v. R. R., 187 N. C., 863.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Hillsboro v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 132 S.E. 657, 191 N.C. 828, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 197 (N.C. 1926).
132 S.E. 657 (Town of Hillsboro v. Merchants & Farmers Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Greene
258 S.E.2d 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Johnson
210 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Town of Tarboro v. Johnson
146 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
146 S.E. 803 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)