Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

119 A.D.2d 582, 500 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55510
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 582 (Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 119 A.D.2d 582, 500 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner, State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (hereinafter the Commissioner), dated January 30, 1985, which, after a hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34, found that the establishment of a community residential facility at a contested location would be appropriate.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner bore the burden of proof at the Padavan hearing, held on December 5, 1984, of adducing concrete and convincing evidence that the establishment of this proposed facility would result in both an overconcentration of similar facilities in the area and a substantial alteration of the nature and character of the community (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [5]; Matter of Town of Hempstead v Commissioner of State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Health, 97 AD2d 826; Town of Hempstead v Commissioner, State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 89 AD2d 850; Grasmere Homeowners’ Assn. v Introne, 84 AD2d 778). The record reveals that the petitioner failed to meet this burden and that the Commissioner’s determination was supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Commissioner of State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Health, 112 AD2d 241).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter's Crossing Neighborhood Ass'n v. Maul
267 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Bartnik v. Maul
223 A.D.2d 541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Collin v. Community Board 7
149 Misc. 2d 610 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
Banchs v. Coughlin
168 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Board of Education of Sewanhaka Central High School District v. Surles
145 Misc. 2d 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Talisman Drive Civic Ass'n v. Webb
138 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Irving Bank Corp. v. Considine
138 Misc. 2d 849 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.2d 582, 500 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-hempstead-v-commissioner-of-state-of-new-york-office-of-mental-nyappdiv-1986.