Town of Goltry v. Grossman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Town of Goltry v. Grossman

122 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1912

DocketNo. A-1193.

StatusPublished

This text of 122 P. 1135 (Town of Goltry v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Goltry v. Grossman, 122 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered againát appellant in the county court of Alfalfa county. Counsel for appellant have never appeared in this court, either by filing a brief or by making an oral argument. They have thereby abandoned their appeal. This court cannot examine records for errors and act as counsel for appellant when such errors are not properly presented to the court. See Price v. State, 5 Okla. Or. 148. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered againát appellant in the county court of Alfalfa county. Counsel for appellant have never appeared in this court, either by filing a brief or by making an oral argument. They have thereby abandoned their appeal. This court cannot examine records for errors and act as counsel for appellant when such errors are not properly presented to the court. See Price v. State, 5 Okla. Or. 148. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-goltry-v-grossman-oklacrimapp-1912.