Town of Goltry v. Grossman
122 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered againát appellant in the county court of Alfalfa county. Counsel for appellant have never appeared in this court, either by filing a brief or by making an oral argument. They have thereby abandoned their appeal. This court cannot examine records for errors and act as counsel for appellant when such errors are not properly presented to the court. See Price v. State, 5 Okla. Or. 148. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Goltry v. Grossman, 122 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).
122 P. 1135 (Town of Goltry v. Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.