Town of Gates v. State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

143 A.D.2d 517, 533 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10649
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The Commissioner’s determination that none of the town’s proposed alternative sites for an adult community residential facility was "suitable” to "accommodate such a facility” (Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [1] [B]) was rational insofar as it interpreted "suitable” to mean comparable to the agency’s proposed site in terms of its size and nature (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [4]). Such determination did not deprive the town of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the site-selection process. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Provenzano, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Law-ton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Gates v. State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 143 A.D.2d 517, 533 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

143 A.D.2d 517 (Town of Gates v. State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter's Crossing Neighborhood Ass'n v. Maul
267 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Town of Cheektowaga v. Howe
206 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)