Town of Cortlandt v. Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of Cortlandt v. Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

80 A.D.2d 648, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 648 (Town of Cortlandt v. Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Cortlandt v. Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 80 A.D.2d 648, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated August 13, 1980, which, after a hearing, found that the establishment of a community residence at a contested location in the Town of Cortlandt would be appropriate, pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 41.34 of the Mental Hugiene Law. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination under review is supported by substantial evidence. Titone, J.P., Rabin, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated August 13, 1980, which, after a hearing, found that the establishment of a community residence at a contested location in the Town of Cortlandt would be appropriate, pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 41.34 of the Mental Hugiene Law. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination under review is supported by substantial evidence. Titone, J.P., Rabin, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 648, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-cortlandt-v-office-of-mental-retardation-developmental-nyappdiv-1981.