Town of Conklin v. Ritter

New York Court of Appeals

Town of Conklin v. Ritter

765 N.E.2d 851, 97 N.Y.2d 712, 739 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 765 N.E.2d 851 (Town of Conklin v. Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Conklin v. Ritter, 765 N.E.2d 851, 97 N.Y.2d 712, 739 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150 (N.Y. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The courts below correctly concluded that the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code applies to defendant’s building. Defendant’s remaining arguments are either unpreserved or without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI