Town of Conklin v. Ritter
765 N.E.2d 851, 97 N.Y.2d 712, 739 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The courts below correctly concluded that the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code applies to defendant’s building. Defendant’s remaining arguments are either unpreserved or without merit.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Conklin v. Ritter, 765 N.E.2d 851, 97 N.Y.2d 712, 739 N.Y.S.2d 355, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 150 (N.Y. 2002).
765 N.E.2d 851 (Town of Conklin v. Ritter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ali v. Goord
15 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)