Town of Coeymans v. Ehrhardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of Coeymans v. Ehrhardt

255 A.D. 899, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5792

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 899 (Town of Coeymans v. Ehrhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Coeymans v. Ehrhardt, 255 A.D. 899, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeals denied. Motion for an order continuing the stay, granted by Justice Pierce H. Russell, granted. Hill P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; MeNamee, J., dissents on the ground that if the city of Albany has failed to pay its taxes, the Tax Law provides the remedy, and that remedy is not by way of mandamus. The order, granted by the Special Term, staying the county treasurer of Albany county in the performance of his statutory duty is invalid for the reason that the court had no power to stay a public official in performing the duty which the Legislature has imposed upon him. The order overruling the preliminary objection of the petitioner is not appealable, and the objection to the appearance of the city’s attorney before the Special Term at Kingston is frivolous. The city may appear by the attorney of its own choice, without the consent of its adversary. I vote to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal, and to deny the continuation of the stay of the Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeals denied. Motion for an order continuing the stay, granted by Justice Pierce H. Russell, granted. Hill P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; MeNamee, J., dissents on the ground that if the city of Albany has failed to pay its taxes, the Tax Law provides the remedy, and that remedy is not by way of mandamus. The order, granted by the Special Term, staying the county treasurer of Albany county in the performance of his statutory duty is invalid for the reason that the court had no power to stay a public official in performing the duty which the Legislature has imposed upon him. The order overruling the preliminary objection of the petitioner is not appealable, and the objection to the appearance of the city’s attorney before the Special Term at Kingston is frivolous. The city may appear by the attorney of its own choice, without the consent of its adversary. I vote to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal, and to deny the continuation of the stay of the Special Term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 899, 7 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-coeymans-v-ehrhardt-nyappdiv-1938.