Town of Carlisle v. Drake

Indiana Supreme Court

Town of Carlisle v. Drake

109 N.E. 39, 183 Ind. 483, 1915 Ind. LEXIS 80

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1915

DocketNo. 22,816

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 N.E. 39 (Town of Carlisle v. Drake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Carlisle v. Drake, 109 N.E. 39, 183 Ind. 483, 1915 Ind. LEXIS 80 (Ind. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Erwin, J.

1. 2. This is an appeal from a judgment for personal injuries in favor of appellee against appellant. The-assignment of errors are (1) that the court erred in refusing a peremptory instruction for appellant, (2) the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The failure to give an instruction tendered can not he assigned as error in this court, hut should he assigned as cause for a new trial. Neither the motion to direct a verdict, nor the motion for a new trial is set out in appellant’s brief as required hy Rule 22 of this court. Por failure to comply with this rule the judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 109 N. E. 39. See, also, under (1) 29 Cyc, 744; (2) 3 C. J. 1417; 2 Cyc. 1015, 1014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin, J.

1. 2. This is an appeal from a judgment for personal injuries in favor of appellee against appellant. The-assignment of errors are (1) that the court erred in refusing a peremptory instruction for appellant, (2) the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The failure to give an instruction tendered can not he assigned as error in this court, hut should he assigned as cause for a new trial. Neither the motion to direct a verdict, nor the motion for a new trial is set out in appellant’s brief as required hy Rule 22 of this court. Por failure to comply with this rule the judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 109 N. E. 39. See, also, under (1) 29 Cyc, 744; (2) 3 C. J. 1417; 2 Cyc. 1015, 1014.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 N.E. 39, 183 Ind. 483, 1915 Ind. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-carlisle-v-drake-ind-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack