Town of Camak v. State Highway Board

143 S.E. 367, 166 Ga. 359, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 305
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1928·No. Nos. 6446, 6460·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. A court of' equity will not interfere with the discretionary action of the State Highway Board in designating and locating a State-aid road, within the sphere of their legally delegated powers, unless such action is arbitrary and amounts to an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. State Highway Department, 164 Ga. 434 (4) (138 S. E. 847), and cit.

2. On the hearing the evidence authorized the finding that the road contended for by plaintiffs had never been designated, laid out, or constructed; also that there was no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the denial of an injunction will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed on main hill of exceptions; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

All the Justices concur. J. B. & T. B. Burnside, for plaintiffs, JS. P. & J. Cecil Davis, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Camak v. State Highway Board, 143 S.E. 367, 166 Ga. 359, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 305 (Ga. 1928).

143 S.E. 367 (Town of Camak v. State Highway Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morningside-Lenox Park Ass'n v. State Highway Department
161 S.E.2d 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
MORNINGSIDE &C. ASSN. v. State Hwy. Dept.
161 S.E.2d 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Appleby v. Holder
143 S.E. 596 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)