Town of Callahan v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Town of Callahan v. Thompson

829 So. 2d 352, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15858, 2002 WL 31431569

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 2002·No. No. 1D01-4085·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of a temporary injunction entered without notice. Because the temporary injunction does not “define the injury, state findings by the court why the injury may be irreparable, [or] give the reasons why the order was granted without notice” as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a)(2), or set a bond as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b), it is reversed. See generally United, Farm Workers of America v. Quincy Corp., 681 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

REVERSED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of a temporary injunction entered without notice. Because the temporary injunction does not “define the injury, state findings by the court why the injury may be irreparable, [or] give the reasons why the order was granted without notice” as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a)(2), or set a bond as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b), it is reversed. See generally United, Farm Workers of America v. Quincy Corp., 681 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

REVERSED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Town of Callahan v. Thompson, 829 So. 2d 352, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15858, 2002 WL 31431569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

829 So. 2d 352 (Town of Callahan v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related