Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water Works

35 A. 884, 19 R.I. 631, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 61
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided November 19, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree which the respondents by their motion seek to have revoked, having been entered by consent, cannot be set aside or revoked except by consent. 2 Dan. Ch. PL & Pr. 6th Am. ed. * 973, * 1459, and notes ; 5 Encyc. Pl. & Pr. 960.

Moreover, it appears that the motion is also to set down the cause for hearing on bill and answer. By stipulation of the parties the bill was amended so as to incorporate the letter of Mr. Bosworth, and we find no denial of this letter or any statement of circumstances which can change the construction necessarily given to it on the hearing of the demurrer. Whatever reason may have moved the respondents to refuse to appoint an arbitrator, or whatever expectation of procedure they may have had in mind after the démurrer had been disposed of, the letter was still a refusal which entitled the complainant to come into equity, and thereby their right to proceed in equity attached.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water Works, 35 A. 884, 19 R.I. 631, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 61 (R.I. 1896).

35 A. 884 (Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Union Cemetery Assn.
40 A.2d 205 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Karnes v. Black
215 S.W. 191 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)
Berry v. Somerset Railway
36 A. 904 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1897)