Town of Boone v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Town of Boone v. State

367 N.C. 815

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 19, 2015

DocketNo. 93P15

StatusPublished

This text of 367 N.C. 815 (Town of Boone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Boone v. State, 367 N.C. 815 (N.C. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On 10 March 2015, defendant State of North Carolina filed a Motion for Temporary Stay Pending Appeal and Petition for Writ of Supersedeas seeking the entry of an order granting a temporary stay and issuance of a writ of supersedeas with respect to a preliminary injunction entered by a three judge panel on 29 December 2014 restraining the operation of N.C. Sess. L. 2014-33, entitled “AN ACT PROVIDING THAT THE TOWN OF BOONE SHALL NOT EXERCISE THE POWERS OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.” Defendant further seeks entry of a temporary stay of any further trial court proceedings pending the disposition of the State’s appeal in this case. The State’s motion and petition are denied without prejudice to the State’s right to renew its motion and petition should the extent to which or manner in which the Town exercises its extraterritorial jurisdiction as of 31 December 2014 materially change.

s/Sam J. Ervin

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On 10 March 2015, defendant State of North Carolina filed a Motion for Temporary Stay Pending Appeal and Petition for Writ of Supersedeas seeking the entry of an order granting a temporary stay and issuance of a writ of supersedeas with respect to a preliminary injunction entered by a three judge panel on 29 December 2014 restraining the operation of N.C. Sess. L. 2014-33, entitled “AN ACT PROVIDING THAT THE TOWN OF BOONE SHALL NOT EXERCISE THE POWERS OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.” Defendant further seeks entry of a temporary stay of any further trial court proceedings pending the disposition of the State’s appeal in this case. The State’s motion and petition are denied without prejudice to the State’s right to renew its motion and petition should the extent to which or manner in which the Town exercises its extraterritorial jurisdiction as of 31 December 2014 materially change.

s/Sam J. Ervin

For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 N.C. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-boone-v-state-nc-2015.