Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Town of Beekman v. Cooper

Town of Beekman v. Cooper

242 A.D.2d 529, 662 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8570
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 8, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D.2d 529 (Town of Beekman v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Beekman v. Cooper, 242 A.D.2d 529, 662 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In an action to permanently enjoin the defendants’ alleged illegal use of property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered June 6, 1996, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants [530]*530met their burden of establishing a legal nonconforming use (see, Matter of Toys “R” Us v Silva, 89 NY2d 411; Matter of Province of Meribah Socy. of Mary v Board of Zoning Appeals, 148 AD2d 512, 514).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toys" R" US v. Silva
676 N.E.2d 862 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Province of Meribah Society of Mary, Inc. v. Village of Muttontown
148 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D.2d 529, 662 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-beekman-v-cooper-nyappdiv-1997.