Town of Barre v. Jerry
This text of 69 Vt. 63 (Town of Barre v. Jerry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an' action founded on R. L. 3132, (V. S. 3513); which provides that one who wantonly or illegally injures a highway, in any of the ways therein specified, shall forfeit to the town, to be expended in repairing highways, not more than thirty dollars, to be recovered by the selectmen, in an action in the name of the town, with costs. The plaintiff obtained a verdict for one dollar, and the court allowed full costs. To this allowance the defendant excepted.
R. L. 1444 (V. S. 1686) restricts costs in actions tried before a justice to five dollars, when the amount recovered does not exceed that sum; and R. L. 1445, (V. S. 1687) provides that when the plaintiff appeals the county court shall be governed by the same rule. The plaintiff would have recovered the restricted costs allowed by this general provision, if nothing had been said about costs in R. L. 3132 (V. S. 3515); so no effect will be given to the words “with costs” contained in that section, unless they arc held to carry full costs. The general provision was enacted as early as 1822, and the section last cited, the substance of which had been before enacted and repealed, dates from the revision of 1839. There is nothing to indicate that the allowance of costs by this section was intended as a mere repetition, and the rule which requires that some force be given to a further legislative expression must be applied.
Jiidgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 Vt. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-barre-v-jerry-vt-1896.