Town of Babylon v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of Babylon v. Perry

230 A.D.2d 802, 646 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8364

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 12, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 230 A.D.2d 802 (Town of Babylon v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Babylon v. Perry, 230 A.D.2d 802, 646 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 to review assessments of real property, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated March 20, 1995, which granted the [803]*803petition of the Town of Babylon to dismiss the appellant’s small claims assessment review complaints.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

RPTL 525 (2) (a) provides, in relevant part, that on the date set for a hearing and determination of a complaint concerning a property tax assessmént, "[i]f the person whose real property is assessed, or his agent or representative, shall willfully neglect or refuse to attend and be so examined, or to answer any question put to him relevant to the complaint or assessment, such person shall not be entitled to any reduction of the assessment subject to the complaint” (emphasis supplied; see, Matter of Fox Meadows Partners v Board of Assessment Review, 227 AD2d 400; Matter of Doubleday & Co. v Board of Assessors, 202 AD2d 424). Here, the appellant failed to appear on the designated Grievance Day and failed to furnish necessary documentation at that time. The Board’s determination that the appellant’s noncompliance was willful was therefore supported by the record (see, Matter of Fox Meadows Partners v Board of Assessment Review, supra; Matter of Jakubovitz v Dworschak, 67 AD2d 977).

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 to review assessments of real property, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated March 20, 1995, which granted the [803]*803petition of the Town of Babylon to dismiss the appellant’s small claims assessment review complaints.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

RPTL 525 (2) (a) provides, in relevant part, that on the date set for a hearing and determination of a complaint concerning a property tax assessmént, "[i]f the person whose real property is assessed, or his agent or representative, shall willfully neglect or refuse to attend and be so examined, or to answer any question put to him relevant to the complaint or assessment, such person shall not be entitled to any reduction of the assessment subject to the complaint” (emphasis supplied; see, Matter of Fox Meadows Partners v Board of Assessment Review, 227 AD2d 400; Matter of Doubleday & Co. v Board of Assessors, 202 AD2d 424). Here, the appellant failed to appear on the designated Grievance Day and failed to furnish necessary documentation at that time. The Board’s determination that the appellant’s noncompliance was willful was therefore supported by the record (see, Matter of Fox Meadows Partners v Board of Assessment Review, supra; Matter of Jakubovitz v Dworschak, 67 AD2d 977).

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D.2d 802, 646 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-babylon-v-perry-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack