Town of Babylon v. N. Y. S. Department of Transportation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of Babylon v. N. Y. S. Department of Transportation

250 A.D.2d 771, 672 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 771 (Town of Babylon v. N. Y. S. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Babylon v. N. Y. S. Department of Transportation, 250 A.D.2d 771, 672 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a hybrid proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, New York State Department of Transportation and Joseph H. Boardman, Acting Commissioner, dated September 6, 1995, that a proposed action was entitled to a negative declaration pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated July 30, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the hybrid proceeding and action.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court correctly dismissed the causes of action which challenged the September 6, 1995, negative declaration made by the respondents, the New York State Department of [772]*772Transportation and Joseph H. Boardman, on the ground that they were barred by the Statute of Limitations (see, Matter of Young v Board of Trustees, 89 NY2d 846).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Luciano, JJ., coiicur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a hybrid proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, New York State Department of Transportation and Joseph H. Boardman, Acting Commissioner, dated September 6, 1995, that a proposed action was entitled to a negative declaration pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated July 30, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the hybrid proceeding and action.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court correctly dismissed the causes of action which challenged the September 6, 1995, negative declaration made by the respondents, the New York State Department of [772]*772Transportation and Joseph H. Boardman, on the ground that they were barred by the Statute of Limitations (see, Matter of Young v Board of Trustees, 89 NY2d 846).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Luciano, JJ., coiicur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 771, 672 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-babylon-v-n-y-s-department-of-transportation-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack