Town of Aurora v. Kranz
This text of 473 N.E.2d 262 (Town of Aurora v. Kranz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 1022), noting that the factual determinations of that court more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence.
[998]*998Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 N.E.2d 262, 63 N.Y.2d 996, 483 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-aurora-v-kranz-ny-1984.