Town of Aurora v. Kranz
473 N.E.2d 262, 63 N.Y.2d 996, 483 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4751
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 1022), noting that the factual determinations of that court more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence.
[998]*998Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Aurora v. Kranz, 473 N.E.2d 262, 63 N.Y.2d 996, 483 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4751 (N.Y. 1984).
473 N.E.2d 262 (Town of Aurora v. Kranz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.
2017 OK 57 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
Town of Avon v. Oliver
2002 WI App 97 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2002)
Berger v. Manhattan Life Insurance
805 F. Supp. 1097 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Rotter v. Coconino County
818 P.2d 704 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1991)