Town of Amherst v. Hilger

104 A.D.3d 1268, 960 N.Y.S.2d 922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Town of Amherst v. Hilger. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 A.D.3d 120
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 2013·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered January 23, 2012. The order, among other things, granted that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking summary judgment against defendants Arthur Hilger and Sally Bisher.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Valentino, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Amherst v. Hilger, 104 A.D.3d 1268, 960 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 1268 (Town of Amherst v. Hilger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)