Town of Alapaha v. Paulk

61 S.E. 401, 130 Ga. 595, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 360
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1908·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Under the pleadings and evidence, there was no abuse of discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

2. The overruling of a demurrer to an equitable petition is not a judgment which can be reviewed as such on a fast writ of error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Alapaha v. Paulk, 61 S.E. 401, 130 Ga. 595, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 360 (Ga. 1908).

61 S.E. 401 (Town of Alapaha v. Paulk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. Goodman
15 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co.
199 S.E. 117 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hall v. Hall
195 S.E. 731 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Bridges v. Poole
168 S.E. 577 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Durham v. Dowling
163 S.E. 503 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Gartrell v. McCravey
86 S.E. 932 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Richards v. McHan
76 S.E. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)