Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker

737 N.E.2d 719, 2000 Ind. LEXIS 713, 2000 WL 1663682
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided August 28, 2000·No. No. 87S01-9911-CV-673·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER ON REHEARING

The Court has had under consideration appellee Shirley Parker’s Petition for Rehearing and has considered it, along with the appellant’s response.

Parker contends that our description of the location of Steam Mill Street is erroneous. The Court understood this aspect of the geography of the case, but we have concluded it would be helpful to amend the sentence about which Parker complains.

Accordingly, we order a sentence in Part II of our opinion, published for the advance sheets on 726 N.E.2d 1217, at 1222, to read instead as follows: “Steam Mill Street is actually a paved street that parallels the northern edge of Parker’s property.”

We grant rehearing for this limited purpose. Parker’s contentions are otherwise unavailing, so we otherwise DENY her Petition for Rehearing.

DICKSON, SULLIVAN, BOEHM, and RUCKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker, 737 N.E.2d 719, 2000 Ind. LEXIS 713, 2000 WL 1663682 (Ind. 2000).

737 N.E.2d 719 (Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ron Shoemaker v. Indiana State Police Department
62 N.E.3d 1242 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2016)
Terra Nova Dairy, LLC v. Wabash County Board of Zoning Appeals
890 N.E.2d 98 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2008)
Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Twin Eagle LLC
798 N.E.2d 839 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2003)
Fratus v. Marion Community Schools Board of Trustees
749 N.E.2d 40 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2001)