Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp.

312 N.E.2d 592, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 852
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided June 18, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

This is an action against the maker and two guarantors to recover the unpaid balance and interest on a $14,000 promissory note. The judge granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment under G. L. c. 231, § 59, and the defendants appealed. The defendants filed answers to the declaration pleading a general denial and various affirmativé defenses. However, the defendants failed to respond to the plaintiffs notice to admit facts, thereby admitting (G. L. c. 231, § 69) sufficient facts to establish the plaintiffs case. G. L. c. 106, § 3-307. In this and all other material respects the case before us is controlled by Loew v. Minasian, 361 Mass. 390 (1972). The order for judgment is affirmed, and as the appeal is frivolous, the plaintiff is to have double costs and interest at the rate of twelve per cent a year from the time of the taking of the appeal. G. L. c. 211 A, § 15.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp., 312 N.E.2d 592, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 852 (Mass. Ct. App. 1974).

312 N.E.2d 592 (Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Industrial Commission
531 N.E.2d 379 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1988)
Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Industrial Commission
526 N.E.2d 861 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1988)