Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp.

312 N.E.2d 592, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 852

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedJune 18, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 312 N.E.2d 592 (Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheraton Investment Corp., 312 N.E.2d 592, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 852 (Mass. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action against the maker and two guarantors to recover the unpaid balance and interest on a $14,000 promissory note. The judge granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment under G. L. c. 231, § 59, and the defendants appealed. The defendants filed answers to the declaration pleading a general denial and various affirmativé defenses. However, the defendants failed to respond to the plaintiffs notice to admit facts, thereby admitting (G. L. c. 231, § 69) sufficient facts to establish the plaintiffs case. G. L. c. 106, § 3-307. In this and all other material respects the case before us is controlled by Loew v. Minasian, 361 Mass. 390 (1972). The order for judgment is affirmed, and as the appeal is frivolous, the plaintiff is to have double costs and interest at the rate of twelve per cent a year from the time of the taking of the appeal. G. L. c. 211 A, § 15.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action against the maker and two guarantors to recover the unpaid balance and interest on a $14,000 promissory note. The judge granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment under G. L. c. 231, § 59, and the defendants appealed. The defendants filed answers to the declaration pleading a general denial and various affirmativé defenses. However, the defendants failed to respond to the plaintiffs notice to admit facts, thereby admitting (G. L. c. 231, § 69) sufficient facts to establish the plaintiffs case. G. L. c. 106, § 3-307. In this and all other material respects the case before us is controlled by Loew v. Minasian, 361 Mass. 390 (1972). The order for judgment is affirmed, and as the appeal is frivolous, the plaintiff is to have double costs and interest at the rate of twelve per cent a year from the time of the taking of the appeal. G. L. c. 211 A, § 15.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 N.E.2d 592, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-bank-trust-co-v-sheraton-investment-corp-massappct-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack