Towles v. United States

497 A.2d 793

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1985·No. 82-964·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that the order of this court entered September 30, 1985, is hereby vacated.

On consideration of the sua sponte call for rehearing en banc, and it appearing that a majority of the judges have voted to rehear this case en banc, it is

ORDERED that this court’s July 25, 1985, 496 A.2d 560, judgment affirming the conviction is vacated, and the August 16, 1985, mandate is recalled. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Clerk is directed to schedule this case for argument before the court en banc. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before October 10, 1985.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that the order of this court entered September 30, 1985, is hereby vacated.

On consideration of the sua sponte call for rehearing en banc, and it appearing that a majority of the judges have voted to rehear this case en banc, it is

ORDERED that this court’s July 25, 1985, 496 A.2d 560, judgment affirming the conviction is vacated, and the August 16, 1985, mandate is recalled. It is

Towles v. United States, 497 A.2d 793 (D.C. 1985).

Pincite

497 A.2d 793 (Towles v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Reid

757 A.2d 482 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Powell v. United States

684 A.2d 373 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)

Towles v. United States

521 A.2d 651 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)

Fireison v. Pearson

520 A.2d 1046 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)

Opinion

Related