Towle v. Robinson
This text of 15 N.H. 408 (Towle v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It may be true that Folsom and the plaintiff are divested of all title to the goods which were attached. If the attachment was dissolved when the receipt of the defendants was executed, the property may have passed to the assignee, discharged from the lien of the attachment. But it will by no means follow that tho contract of the defendants, upon which this action is founded, is discharged also. It was founded upon a sufficient [410]*410consideration when it was executed, viz., the delivery of the property to the defendants. That consideration has not failed. That contract is not discharged or affectedby the bankruptcy of Folsom. The plaintiff’s right of action was perfect before Folsom was declared a bankrupt. The security was perfected, therefore, and the case raises no question whether an attachment is dissolved by a petition and decree of bankruptcy.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.H. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/towle-v-robinson-nhsuperct-1844.