Towle v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Towle v. Richardson

63 Vt. 96

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TYLER, J.

It is stated in the exceptions, which were granted by the City Judge, that the question submitted to and [97] decided by hini was whether the defendant was about to abscond or remove from the State when lie was arrested on the capias writ, Sept. 2, 1889. Without passing upon the other questions suggested, in the brief of the plaintiff’s counsel, it is sufficient ground for dismissing the exceptions that the question decided was purely one of fact.

Exceptions dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TYLER, J.

It is stated in the exceptions, which were granted by the City Judge, that the question submitted to and [97] decided by hini was whether the defendant was about to abscond or remove from the State when lie was arrested on the capias writ, Sept. 2, 1889. Without passing upon the other questions suggested, in the brief of the plaintiff’s counsel, it is sufficient ground for dismissing the exceptions that the question decided was purely one of fact.

Exceptions dismissed.

Towle v. Richardson, 63 Vt. 96 (Vt. 1890).

Pincite

63 Vt. 96 (Towle v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related