Towle v. Raymond

58 N.H. 64
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided July 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The general rule is, that a bailee for hire, who bestows labor and expense upon personal property at the owner’s request, has a lien upon the property lawfully in his possession, for his reasonable charges. 2 Kent Com. 635; Bevan v. Waters, 3 C. & P. 520; Scarfe v. Morgan, 4 M. & W. 270; Dennett v. Cutts, 11 N. H. 163, 166; Wilson v. Martin, 40 N. H. 88; Jacobs v. Knapp, 50 N. H. 71. For training the mare, the defendant had a lien at common law. The statute gave him a lien for her board, and a right to enforce both liens by sale. Gen. St., c. 125.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Towle v. Raymond, 58 N.H. 64 (N.H. 1877).

58 N.H. 64 (Towle v. Raymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Oldham
90 N.W.2d 329 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1958)