Towl v. Bradley

Michigan Supreme Court

Towl v. Bradley

66 N.W. 347, 108 Mich. 409, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 991

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 26, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 66 N.W. 347 (Towl v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Towl v. Bradley, 66 N.W. 347, 108 Mich. 409, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 991 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Hooker, J.

This case is within the rule laid down in Monaghan v. Insurance Co., 53 Mich. 245. The defendant had a right to question the jurors upon the subject of their prejudices against the defense of the statute of limitations, as a means of determining whether or not to exercise the right of peremptory challenge.

As the other assignments of error are not discussed in the brief, we do not pass upon them.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI