Towl v. Bradley
66 N.W. 347, 108 Mich. 409, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 991
Opinion
This case is within the rule laid down in Monaghan v. Insurance Co., 53 Mich. 245. The defendant had a right to question the jurors upon the subject of their prejudices against the defense of the statute of limitations, as a means of determining whether or not to exercise the right of peremptory challenge.
As the other assignments of error are not discussed in the brief, we do not pass upon them.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Towl v. Bradley, 66 N.W. 347, 108 Mich. 409, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 991 (Mich. 1896).
66 N.W. 347 (Towl v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Harrell
247 N.W.2d 829 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1976)
People v. Milkovich
188 N.W.2d 124 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
People v. Lockhart
70 N.W.2d 802 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1955)
Stuart v. Denton
280 P.2d 351 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1955)
Gornetzky v. Gornetzky
137 N.W. 706 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Richards v. United States
175 F. 911 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)
People v. Peck
103 N.W. 178 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Stowell v. Standard Oil Co.
102 N.W. 227 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)