Towery v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Towery v. State

162 S.W. 498, 72 Tex. Crim. 297, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 652

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 23, 1913

DocketNo. 2894.

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.W. 498 (Towery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Towery v. State, 162 S.W. 498, 72 Tex. Crim. 297, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 652 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of making an aggravated assault on A. D. France. He undertakes to appeal to this court, hut the recognizance entered into is insufficient in law to confer jurisdiction on this court. Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed. Articles 886, 887 and 888, and decisions cited thereunder in White’s Ann. Code Criminal Procedure.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

DAVIDSON, Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of making an aggravated assault on A. D. France. He undertakes to appeal to this court, hut the recognizance entered into is insufficient in law to confer jurisdiction on this court. Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed. Articles 886, 887 and 888, and decisions cited thereunder in White’s Ann. Code Criminal Procedure.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

DAVIDSON, Judge, absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.W. 498, 72 Tex. Crim. 297, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/towery-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.