Towery, Doshee Swan
This text of Towery, Doshee Swan (Towery, Doshee Swan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-74,680-09
EX PARTE DOSHEE SWAN TOWERY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 07F0058-102-G IN THE 102ND DISTRICT COURT FROM BOWIE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Towery
v. State, 262 S.W.3d 586 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008).
In a single ground, Applicant contends that he is actually innocent. This application,
however, presents a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed five
prior applications that have been dismissed under Article 11.07, § 4 of the Code of Criminal 2
Procedure. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been
presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous
applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373
U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive
claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are
waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application
pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims
presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous
application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: September 14, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Towery, Doshee Swan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/towery-doshee-swan-texapp-2016.