Tower v. Wilson

New York Supreme Court

Tower v. Wilson

3 Cai. Cas. 174, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 494

DecidedAugust 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 174 (Tower v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tower v. Wilson, 3 Cai. Cas. 174, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 494 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

There was a notice served on the defendant to produce a Jt. fa. on the trial, or that the plaintiff would proVe it by parol. It appears that no copy of this notice was kepi. We think it might be proved by an affidavit of its contents. In this instance there is no other way to establish it, and the defendant has it in his power, by producing the original, to correct mistakes. In Tid'd’s forms, notices are proved, by affidavits of the substance of their contents,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

There was a notice served on the defendant to produce a Jt. fa. on the trial, or that the plaintiff would proVe it by parol. It appears that no copy of this notice was kepi. We think it might be proved by an affidavit of its contents. In this instance there is no other way to establish it, and the defendant has it in his power, by producing the original, to correct mistakes. In Tid'd’s forms, notices are proved, by affidavits of the substance of their contents,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cai. Cas. 174, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tower-v-wilson-nysupct-1805.