Tower v. United States
31 Cust. Ct. 255, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tower v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Cust. Ct. 284 →
United States Customs Court·Decided October 1, 1953·No. No. 57507; protests 156174-K, etc. (Buffalo)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair-on leather the same in all material respects as that the subject of Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1436), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tower v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 255, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1035 (cusc 1953).
31 Cust. Ct. 255 (Tower v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 8 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)