Tower v. Hobbs

First Circuit

Tower v. Hobbs

129 F. 918, 64 C.C.A. 478, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4110

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 5, 1904·No. No. 515·Published

Opinion

LOWELL, District Judge.

The question here raised was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Tower v. Eagle Pencil Co., 94 Fed. 361, 36 C. C. A. 294. Upon consideration we find no reason to differ from that court in its conclusion that a pen precisely like the defendant’s, here in evidence, did not infringe the patent in suit. Concerning the validity of that patent we express no opinion.

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers his costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOWELL, District Judge.

The question here raised was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Tower v. Eagle Pencil Co., 94 Fed. 361, 36 C. C. A. 294. Upon consideration we find no reason to differ from that court in its conclusion that a pen precisely like the defendant’s, here in evidence, did not infringe the patent in suit. Concerning the validity of that patent we express no opinion.

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers his costs of appeal.

Tower v. Hobbs, 129 F. 918, 64 C.C.A. 478, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4110 (1st Cir. 1904).

Pincite

129 F. 918 (Tower v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related