Tower v. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad

7 Mich. 10, 1859 Mich. LEXIS 40
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Chiee Justice:

We have repeatedly decided that we will not reverse the judgment of the circuit court, oñ a question of fact in :such a case; but ivhether that principle is applicable to this case, should be discussed at the hearing, and not on such a ■motion.

Mr. Gould also offered affidavits, to prove the fact upon 'which his first position was based.

'Ohristiancy, J.:

Have you any authorities that hold you may show such a fact by affidavit, where the record does not dis‘close it ?

'Gould:

The affidavits are offered in aid of the record, which does not show that there was an argument.

The Chiee Justice:

We can not consider.a question of this nature on affi’davits. The motion must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tower v. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad, 7 Mich. 10, 1859 Mich. LEXIS 40 (Mich. 1859).

7 Mich. 10 (Tower v. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 437 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)
Fenton v. Salt Lake County
4 Utah 116 (Utah Supreme Court, 1885)