Tower v. Bradley
This text of 66 Ill. 189 (Tower v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is brought here by writ of error, and a printed brief, filed by counsel, which seeks to establish these points, viz: First&emdash;By professing to direct the verdict to be reduced to form, the court changed it in matter of substance, and the judgment is not responsive to the issues. Second&emdash;The defendants were entitled to a return of the property. Third&emdash;The instructions given for the defendants below were incorrect.
There is no bill of exceptions in the case, and it is a matter of surprise that attorneys will bring a record here, and assign errors, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, as to matters which can become a part of the record, and be subject to review in this court, only by a bill of exceptions.
The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Ill. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tower-v-bradley-ill-1872.