Tower Realty Company v. City of East Detroit

188 F.2d 363, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3030
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1951·No. 11179_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A petition on behalf of the above appellant seeks clarification of our opinion filed in the above cause on December 15, 1950. 6 Cir., 185 F.2d 590. It assumes that in our discussion of the question of jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship, we failed to consider other jurisdictional grounds presented in its reply brief.

It is our conclusion that if there be any ambiguity in the final paragraph of the opinion which suggests facts to be considered by the district court upon retrial, there should now be added to such direction the following:

“The court will, of course, upon retrial, be free to consider any ground of jurisdiction other than that based upon diversity of citizenship, if it be found that the appellant is the real party in interest.”

It is so ordered.

Judge MILLER is of the opinion that jurisdiction exists under § 1331, Title 28 U.S.C.A. and that the order appealed from should be reviewed on the present record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tower Realty Company v. City of East Detroit, 188 F.2d 363, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3030 (6th Cir. 1951).

188 F.2d 363 (Tower Realty Company v. City of East Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tower Realty Co. v. City of East Detroit, Mich
185 F.2d 590 (Sixth Circuit, 1950)