TOWER IMAGING, LLC, etc. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2022·No. 21-1944·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 2, 2022.

________________

No. 3D21-1944 Lower Tribunal No. 21-3035 SP ________________

Tower Imaging, LLC, etc., Appellant,

vs.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. Barket, Judge.

Daly & Barber, P.A., Christina M. Kalin, Matthew C. Barber and John C. Daly (Plantation), for appellant.

Akerman, LLP, Marcy Levine Aldrich and Nancy A. Copperthwaite, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Tower Imaging, LLC, d/b/a Blackfin Medical (as assignee of Rebecca

Jeznach) (“Blackfin”), appeals the trial court’s order granting State Farm

Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“State Farm”) motion to transfer

the case based on forum non-conveniens. Blackfin claims that the motion

to transfer was not based on any supporting evidence presented by State

Farm and further claims that the trial court erred by requiring Blackfin to pay

the transfer fee. State Farm responds and confesses error in both respects.

Upon review of the record, we agree. See Miracle Chiropractic & Rehab Ctr.

v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1078 (Fla. 4th DCA

May 12, 2021).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWER IMAGING, LLC, etc. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

TOWER IMAGING, LLC, etc. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (TOWER IMAGING, LLC, etc. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.