Towbin v. Pierro
131 A. 923, 99 N.J. Eq. 434, 14 Stock. 434, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 539
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Towbin v. Pierro, 131 A. 923, 99 N.J. Eq. 434, 14 Stock. 434, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 539 (N.J. 1926).
131 A. 923 (Towbin v. Pierro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Callaghen v. Segal
184 A. 396 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)