Tovmasyan v. Ashcroft
This text of 109 F. App'x 901 (Tovmasyan v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Aghasi Khachik Tovmasyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Tovmasyan did not establish that he was persecuted in Armenia on account a protected ground because he failed to show that he was threatened or harassed due to his father’s political opin[902]*902ion. See id. at 1177. Accordingly, Tovmasyan did not establish his eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. See id. at 1180.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tovmasyan-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.