Tovar-Mauricio v. T.R. Driscoll, Inc.

772 S.E.2d 239, 368 N.C. 68
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 11, 2015·No. No. 9A14·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARYREVIEWIMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tovar-Mauricio v. T.R. Driscoll, Inc., 772 S.E.2d 239, 368 N.C. 68 (N.C. 2015).

772 S.E.2d 239 (Tovar-Mauricio v. T.R. Driscoll, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.