Tousley v. Tousley
This text of 275 A.D.2d 998 (Tousley v. Tousley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent failed to contend before Family Court that alcohol abuse and refusal of treatment do not constitute aggravating circumstances within the meaning of Family Court Act § 827 (a) (vii) and § 842. Thus, respondent failed to preserve for our review his present contention that the court erred in issuing a three-year order of protection based on his alcohol abuse and refusal of treatment (see generally, Matter of Tanya R. B. v Darren W., 254 AD2d 813; Matter of Mary Alice V., 222 AD2d 594, lv denied 87 NY2d 811; Matter of Kagels v Kagels, 209 AD2d 1020). In any event, we agree with the court that respondent’s alcohol abuse and refusal of treatment constitute aggravating circumstances within the meaning of Family Court Act § 842, and we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the order (see, Family Ct Act § 827 [a] [vii]; § 842). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J.— Custody.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 998, 715 N.Y.S.2d 199, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tousley-v-tousley-nyappdiv-2000.