Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission

349 A.2d 736, 170 Conn. 709
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 6, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 349 A.2d 736 (Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission, 349 A.2d 736, 170 Conn. 709 (Colo. 1976).

Opinion

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled ease has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the plaintiff files his brief on or before January 27, 1976.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 A.2d 736, 170 Conn. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tousignant-v-liquor-control-commission-conn-1976.