Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission
349 A.2d 736, 170 Conn. 709
Opinion
It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled ease has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the plaintiff files his brief on or before January 27, 1976.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission, 349 A.2d 736, 170 Conn. 709 (Colo. 1976).
349 A.2d 736 (Tousignant v. Liquor Control Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.