Tousey v. Lockwood

30 Ind. 153
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 30 Ind. 153 (Tousey v. Lockwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tousey v. Lockwood, 30 Ind. 153 (Ind. 1868).

Opinion

Frazer, J.

The only exception in this record is to the action of the Circuit Court in overruling a motion for a new trial based upon the grounds that the finding was contrary to law and the evidence. The evidence is not in the record by a bill of exceptions, but the judge has stated some [154]*154of it in the finding itself. Whether he thus has stated all the evidence does not appear. We cannot therefore reverse upon the evidence. It is not the office of a verdict to preserve the evidence, nor to contain it. It should find facts, and a finding by the judge may also state conclusions of law upon the facts found, but a mere statement of evidence, though it be all the evidence, cannot answer any of the purposes of a special finding, nor can it be a substitute for a bill of exceptions. Davis v. Franklin, 25 Ind. 407.

J. A. Matson, for appellant. F. F. Ritter, for appellees.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Krebs v. Griffin
45 N.E. 935 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
Boyer v. Robertson
144 Ind. 604 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Miller
37 N.E. 343 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Whitcomb v. Smith
24 N.E. 109 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Hessong v. Pressley
86 Ind. 555 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Woodfill v. Patton
76 Ind. 575 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Ind. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tousey-v-lockwood-ind-1868.