Tousey v. Butler
9 Tex. 525
Opinion
The mistake in stating the Christian name of one of the parties plaintiff is tho common case of a misnomer; and it is well settled that after misnomer pleaded in abatement, the plaintiff may correct the mistake by amendment: (Cartwright v. Chabert, 3 Tex. R., 261.) It can malee no difference whether the misnomer pleaded be tho Christian or surname; the rule is the same.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tousey v. Butler, 9 Tex. 525 (Tex. 1853).
9 Tex. 525 (Tousey v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. S. Abercrombie Co. v. Hagen
238 S.W.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Presley v. Wilson
125 S.W.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Rogers v. Allen
80 S.W.2d 1085 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Griffin v. Berry
6 S.W.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Rabb v. Rogers
3 S.W. 303 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)