Tousant v. Aragona
This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 04870 (Tousant v. Aragona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Tousant v Aragona |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 04870 |
| Decided on August 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on August 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
558 CA 21-00921
v
JOHN M. ARAGONA AND CENTRAL SQUARE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
THE LONG LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JAMES AUSTIN LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. KAISER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered January 27, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants insofar as it sought to compel production of the cell phone of Anthony J. Farrell.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Tousant v Aragona ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [Aug. 4, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: August 4, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 NY Slip Op 04870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tousant-v-aragona-nyappdiv-2022.